Abstract
AbstractThis paper identifies two paradigms of vicarious liability. One is an established paradigm of ‘liberal agency’ found in cases where owner-managers ‘act through’ workers, with whom they have personal relations, in undertaking work tasks. The second paradigm is found in cases concerning bureaucratic organisations, which are characterised by chains of command and variegated decision-making procedures. Courts have grounded organisational responsibility in features such as structure, hierarchy, and control, which this paper uses to construct a model of the ‘deterrable organisation’. The deterrable organisation has important capacities to effect change in behaviour that courts rely on in order to prevent worker wrongdoing. The paper tests the viability of the model against the empirical literature and argues that courts could improve outcomes by a more targeted use of powers to award remedies.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference76 articles.
1. Vicarious liability: an ever-expanding concept?;Tutin;Ind LJ,2016
2. "No Soul to Damn: No Body to Kick": An Unscandalized Inquiry into the Problem of Corporate Punishment
3. The first-party insurance externality: an economic justification for enterprise liability;Hanson;Cornell LR,1990
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献