Author:
Sollars Gordon G.,Tuluca Sorin A.
Abstract
ABSTRACT:A common moral argument is that shareholders have a special status because of risk when considering the duties of corporate management. The privileges of this status usually include the idea that management should adopt the goal of maximizing shareholder wealth. We argue that modern financial theory demonstrates that this argument should be modified by the recognition of a principle of desert, the shareholder desert principle (SDP). Financial theory can usefully circumscribe the duty owed to shareholders and the extent to which risk bearing justifies a claim on corporate value. When combined with the SDP, the result provides management with a guideline for what is owed to shareholders before other stakeholder non-contractual claims may be satisfied. As such, our approach provides management with some guidance through the thicket of competing stakeholder claims.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Philosophy,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference51 articles.
1. Corporate Governance
2. Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: a survey
3. “Why We Should Stop Teaching Dodge v. Ford.”;Stout;Virginia Law and Business Review,2008
4. On financial contracting
5. “Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium Under Conditions of Risk.”;Sharpe;Journal of Finance,1964
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献