Author:
Kirkland Christopher,Wood Matthew
Abstract
Declining voter turnout has been highlighted as problematic for a number of western democracies. However, in this article we argue that whether an election is seen as ‘legitimate’ or not depends crucially upon interpretations of the levels of turnout by elite actors. Through comparing two recent democratic ballots in the UK we demonstrate how elections with lower turnouts can come to be seen as holding more legitimacy than those with higher turnouts. The cases demonstrate, we argue, a distinction between actual legitimacy, defined as a binary concept, and the process of legitimization – a process through which the authority of an institution is discursively constructed and conferred. This suggests a new research agenda which extends beyond the current literature to focus upon how the legitimacy of a ballot is socially constructed in a broader context of unequal socioeconomic power relations.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science
Reference55 articles.
1. The Telegraph (2013a), ‘NUT and NASUWT Announce Teachers’ Plan to Strike in October’, The Telegraph, 5 September, www.telegraph.co.uk/education/10288098/NUT-and-NASUWT-announce-teachers-plan-to-strike-in-October.html.
2. The Democratic Turnout ‘Problem’
3. Hill L. and Louth J. (2004), ‘Compulsory Voting Laws and Turnout: Efficacy and Appropriateness’, paper presented at the Australasian Political Studies Association Conference, University of Adelaide.
4. Unequal Participation: Democracy's Unresolved Dilemma Presidential Address, American Political Science Association, 1996
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献