Abstract
AbstractThis article challenges the widely held view that WTO Members are not permitted to impose trade restrictions on other WTO Members in the form of countermeasures for breaches of international law. It cautions that this generally held view has wider implications for international law and multilateralism because countermeasures are a significant means of enforcing and preserving the normative integrity of international obligations outside the WTO, including erga omnes and erga omnes partes obligations. Arguments supporting their ‘displacement’ must be based on clear evidence, which this article shows to be lacking. This article also attempts to allay the (understandable but perhaps exaggerated) concern that such countermeasures might undermine the predictability of the WTO system. Trade countermeasures for breaches of extra-WTO obligations are subject to stringent conditions under customary international law and to judicial scrutiny by means of WTO adjudication, both of which minimise the space for abuse and the risk of unpredictability.
Funder
H2020 European Research Council
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,Political Science and International Relations
Reference29 articles.
1. The Optimal Design of International Trade Institutions: Uncertainty and Escape;Rosendorff;IntlOrg,2001
2. Article XX of GATT and the Problem of Extraterritorial Jurisdiction: The Case of Trade Measures for the Protection of Human Rights;Bartels;JWT,2002
3. Some Observations on the Part of Protest in International Law;McGibbon;BYBIL,1953
4. Human Rights Sanctions and International Trade: A Theory of Compatibility
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献