Abstract
AbstractOn 7 June 2018, the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom (UKSCt) issued its decision on, inter alia, whether Northern Ireland's near-total abortion ban was compatible with the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR). This article critically assesses the UKSC's treatment of international law in this case. It argues that the UKSCt was justified in finding that Northern Ireland's ban on abortion in cases of rape, incest, and FFA was a violation of Article 8, but that the majority erred in its assessment of Article 3 ECHR and of the relevance of international law more generally.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,Political Science and International Relations
Reference25 articles.
1. Is the Prohibition Against Torture, Cruel, Inhuman and Degrading Treatment Really “Absolute” in International Human Rights Law? A Reply to Graffin and Mavronicola;Greer;HRLR,2018
2. National Supreme Courts and the Development of ECHR Rights;Bjorge;I-CON,2011
3. Are All Abortions Equal? Should There Be Exceptions to the Criminalization of Abortion for Rape and Incest?
4. Termination of Pregnancy for Reason of Foetal Disability: Are There Grounds for a Special Exception in Law?
5. Repealing the 8th
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献