Abstract
AbstractEuropean private international law has long been recognised as improperly set up to deal with cross-border collective redress. In light of this shortcoming, it seems unfortunate that the private international law implications of the Representative Actions Directive (Directive (EU) No 2020/1828) have not yet been addressed coherently by the European legislator. This article examines to what extent the policy of promoting collective redress can be supported, even if only partially, through a reinterpretation of the jurisdictional rules of the Brussels Ia Regulation. Furthermore, it discusses which legislative measures need to be adopted to better accommodate collective redress mechanisms within the Brussels regime.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,Political Science and International Relations
Reference22 articles.
1. Grenzüberschreitende Wirkung von Vergleichen und Urteilen im Musterfeststellungsverfahren;Stadler;NJW,2020
2. The EU Directive on Representative Actions for Consumers: A Milestone or Another Missed Opportunity?;Biard;ZEuP,2019
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献