Abstract
AbstractSince the beginning of the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, numerous Western States have supplied Ukraine with arms, munitions and war material, in ostensible breach of their obligations as neutral, non-participating States. States have failed to provide any legal explanation for such transfers, leaving the task to scholars and commentators to provide legal argumentation as to the compatibility of arms transfers to victims of aggression with neutral duties. This article analyses and seeks to evaluate these arguments in favour of ‘qualified neutrality’ and assess which of the proposed grounds, if any, are the most compelling.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,Political Science and International Relations
Reference25 articles.
1. State Responsibility for Genocide: A Follow-Up
2. The Budapest Resolutions of 1934 on the Briand-Kellogg Pact of Paris
3. Cyber Operations and Collective Countermeasures under International Law;Haataja;JCandSL,2020
4. The Present Status of Neutrality
5. Collective Countermeasures in Cyberspace;Kosseff;NotreDameJIntlandCompL,2020
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献