Legal Cultures, Legal Paradigms and Legal Doctrine: Towards a New Model for Comparative Law

Author:

Van Hoecke Mark,Warrington Mark

Abstract

Over the past decade especially, many writers have emphasised the need for a broad approach to the subject of comparative law, thereby moving it beyond the “law as rules” approach of traditional legal doctrine. It is becoming steadily apparent that comparatists cannot limit themselves to simply comparing rules. The “law as rules” approach has to be placed in a much wider context Broader investigation reveals that it is not even rules which are at the core of the comparative endeavour; it is, rather, the legal discourse, the way lawyers work with the law and reason about it.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Law,Political Science and International Relations

Reference112 articles.

1. Lee L. T. and Lai W. W. , “The Chinese Conceptions of Law: Confucian, Legalist and Buddhist” (1978) 29 Hastings L.J. 1307.

2. As Dekkers R. , Discoun Rectorauz (1970), p. 19, has noted: “The Bantu is not an individualist the European. What would be the fate of the individual in Africa, left to his own devices, without the support of the applied sciences or modern techniques? At the risk of dying, he has to be member of a group, his tribe, in order to defend himself against nature.”

3. Stone F. F. , “The End to be Served by Comparative Law” (1951) 25 Tulane L.Rev. 325.

Cited by 90 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The challenge of safe and sustainable development of the unmanned ship: seeking for effective legal responses;Frontiers in Marine Science;2024-08-19

2. Qualitative Fieldwork;The Cambridge Handbook of Comparative Law;2024-02-01

3. Culture and Comparative Law Methodology;The Cambridge Handbook of Comparative Law;2024-02-01

4. Traditional Methods;The Cambridge Handbook of Comparative Law;2024-02-01

5. Methods of Comparative Law;The Cambridge Handbook of Comparative Law;2024-02-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3