Abstract
AbstractThis article analyses the relationship of the proposed Common European Sales Law (CESL) and the rules on mandatory and overriding provisions in private international law. The author argues that the CESL will not achieve its stated aim of taking precedence over these provisions of national law and therefore not lead to an increase in cross-border trade. It is pointed out how slight changes in drafting can overcome the collision with mandatory provisions. The clash with overriding mandatory provisions, the author argues, should be taken as an opportunity to rethink the definition of these provisions.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,Political Science and International Relations
Reference29 articles.
1. Unfair Contract Terms act 1977 and the Conflict of Laws
2. Avoid the Statutist Trap. The International Scope of the Consumer Credit Act 1974;Bisping;JPIL,2012
3. Contract Law
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献