Author:
Bailey David J.,Shibata Saori
Abstract
In contrast to much of the political economy literature, this article explores acts of refusal that obstruct attempts to impose austerity measures on advanced industrial democracies. It thereby complements a literature that has thus far focused far more upon the (apparently unobstructed) imposition of austerity. In doing so, it uses two typically ‘low-resistance’ countries – Japan and the UK –as least-likely cases and finds that austerity is rarely uncontested. Using fuzzy set Qualitative Comparative Analysis, it highlights the ‘causal recipes’ sufficient for both (1) anti-austerity activity to have a significant impact on austerity proposals and (2) the smooth (unobstructed) imposition of austerity. The politics of austerity is shown to be better understood as an iterative interaction between proposals for austerity and the acts of refusal they encounter. These obstacles to austerity appear more straightforward to activate effectively in Japan’s coordinated model of capitalism, whilst the UK’s liberal market economy tends to generate more innovative forms of dissent that (if they are sufficiently militant) provide an alternative route towards the obstruction of austerity.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Reference89 articles.
1. Browne James , and Elming William . 2015. The Effect of the Coalition’s Tax and Benefit Changes on Household Incomes and Work Incentives. IFS Briefing Note BN 159. Available from http://www.ifs.org.uk/uploads/publications/bns/BN159.pdf, accessed 1 March 2016.
2. Development and Crisis of the Welfare State
3. Redesigning Social Inquiry
4. Joined at the hip, but pulling apart? Franco-German relations, the Eurozone crisis and the politics of austerity
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献