Abstract
AbstractThe rise of non-Western powers has led to competing claims about how these states act among each other and how they behave vis-à-vis established powers. Existing accounts argue that the rising powers are a heterogenous group of competing states and that they are socialized into the existing Western-centered order. This article challenges these claims, arguing that the rising powers are dissatisfied with the international status quo and that they have begun to form a bloc against the established powers. The authors contend that this dissatisfaction arises from their lack of influence on the international stage, their status in the international hierarchy and the norms that sustain the current international order. They maintain that the formation of a rising powers bloc is driven by the countries’ economic growth and international dynamics, fostering their institutionalization as IBSA (India, Brazil, South Africa) and BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa). To support this argument, the study combines spatial modeling techniques to analyze rising power voting behavior in the UN General Assembly over the period 1992–2011.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Reference77 articles.
1. Scaling Roll Call Votes withwnominateinR
2. Payne, T (2014) The Global Governance of Global Crisis: Why the G20 Summit was Created and What We Still Need it to Do. University of Sheffield SPERI Working Paper.
3. Ikenberry, JG and Wright, T (2008) Rising Powers and Global Institutions. New York: Century Foundation.
4. Leadership Turnover and Foreign Policy Change: Societal Interests, Domestic Institutions, and Voting in the United Nations
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献