Abstract
Citizen perceptions of the extent of fraud in a given authoritarian election can differ widely. This article builds on the literature on information acquisition and processing in democracies to argue that much of this variation is due to the way in which citizens’ underlying political orientations affect both the kind of information they gather and how they process that information. These differences in information acquisition and processing have important implications for how election monitoring reports, access to the internet and other sources of information are likely to affect the stability of contemporary authoritarian regimes. The theory is tested using observational data and a survey experiment from the Russian presidential election of 2012.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Reference49 articles.
1. Now out of Never: The Element of Surprise in the East European Revolution of 1989
2. Competitive Authoritarianism
3. Voter Fraud in the Eye of the Beholder;Ansolabehere;Harvard Law Review,2008
4. Opium for the Masses: How Foreign Media Can Stabilize Authoritarian Regimes
5. Kelley Judith , and Kolev Kiril . 2010. Election Quality and International Observation 1975-2004: Two New Datasets. Available from SSRN http://ssrn.com/abstract=1694654, accessed 12 June 2015.
Cited by
71 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献