Author:
Crook Sara Brandes,Hibbing John R.
Abstract
The US House of Representatives underwent a series of reforms in the 1970s which, on paper, changed the institution in fundamental ways. Often, however, institutional inertia is able to transform important ‘paper’ changes into barely discernible actual changes. Have the reforms really led to alterations in the way Congress operates and the policies it produces? To provide a partial answer to this question, we single out one of the reforms – a change in the application of the seniority system in the selection of committee chairmen – and analyse it with an eye towards one hypothesized effect – alterations in the level of party support among key representatives. But by restricting our study in this manner, we are able to provide specific empirical facts which should be of considerable assistance in the important task of formulating more generalized conclusions about the ability of legislative reform to produce real change in the governing process.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Reference65 articles.
1. Fenno , Congressmen in Committees
2. Safe Seats, Seniority, and Power in Congress
3. Berg John , ‘The Effects of Seniority Reform on Three House Committees in the 94th Congress’
4. Keefe , Congress and the American People, p. 76
Cited by
50 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献