Author:
Evans Geoffrey,Whitefield Stephen
Abstract
Explanations of cross-national variation in levels of popular support for democracy can be distinguished by the relative emphasis they place on the importance of economic and political factors. ‘First generation’ theorists emphasized economic variables, including levels of economic development and rising expectations. In contrast, ‘second generation’ writers have focused on the role of political factors, including the mode of the transition to democracy itself and the effectiveness of the institutions and electoral processes which emerge. This article uses national probability samples from Bulgaria, Estonia, Hungary, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Russia and Ukraine to examine potential influences on support for democratic processes in postcommunist Europe. These influences include evaluations of electoral and market performance, experience of economic well-being in the recent past and the near future, and indicators of the perceived responsiveness of the electoral system. Although both political and economic factors are found to be significant, multivariate analysis indicates that political experience is of greater weight than is economic. Moreover, when support for marketization is controlled for, there is very little link from economic experience to support for democracy.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Reference65 articles.
1. Pearson's R and Coarsely Categorized Measures
2. The Neoliberal Fallacy
3. World Bank Policy Research Bulletin, 2 (1991), pp. 1–4.
4. Rueschemeyer , Stephens and Stephens , Capitalist Development and Democracy, p. 169.
5. Political Regimes and Economic Growth
Cited by
248 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献