Abstract
This article outlines a theory of government failure that parallels the more well-established theory of market failure. It builds on the work of the public choice school concerning the behaviour of governments under the assumption that all relevant agents pursue their selfinterest. It examines the theoretical consequences for efficiency and equity of three kinds of government activity: provision, subsidy and regulation. The conclusion is reached that all three may create inefficiency and inequity, but that the form and magnitude of the failure will differ with the type of activity; hence it is important that the three are distinguished. It is also emphasised that the extent of government failure in each case (and whether it is greater or smaller than the corresponding areas of market failure) is ultimately an empirical question, not a theoretical one.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Reference62 articles.
1. Goodin , Le Grand , Not Only the Poor.
2. Le Grand J. , ‘Measuring the Distributional Impact of the Welfare State: Methodological Issues’
3. How Far is the Poll Tax a 'Communitv Charge'? The Implications of Service Usage Evidence
4. Stigler , ed., Chicago Studies in Political Economy
Cited by
197 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献