Author:
Gong Z.,Soomro S. A.,Nanjappan V.,Georgiev G. V.
Abstract
AbstractExtant research indicates that Chinese higher education has overlooked creativity. However, based on indirect clues, we infer that the degree of emphasis on creativity and related courses in Chinese higher education has changed. Therefore, we conducted a survey using a questionnaire to compare the creativity-related courses and adopted creativity methods in higher education between China and developed countries. The results indicate that participation rates and assessments of creativity-related courses, adopted creativity methods, and evaluations differ between China and developed countries.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference41 articles.
1. Salamatov, Y. and Souchkov, V. (1999) TRIZ: the right solution at the right time: a guide to innovative problem solving. Insytec Hattem.
2. Georgiev, G.V. (2019) ‘Meanings in Digital Fabrication’, in Proceedings of the FabLearn Europe 2019 conference. FabLearn Europe ’19, Association for Computing Machinery (FabLearn Europe ’19), pp. 1–3. https://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3335055.3335073.
3. Sosa, R. (2020b) ‘Retrospective and Prospective of the Study of Design Creativity: 80 Years into the Past and the Future’, in Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Design Creativity (ICDC 2020). The Design Society, pp. 001–010. https://dx.doi.org/10.35199/ICDC.2020.01.
4. Creativity and Economic Development;Bobirca;World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology,2011
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献