Abstract
AbstractDeep learning approaches are superior in natural language processing due to their ability to extract informative features and patterns from languages. The two most successful neural architectures are LSTM and transformers, used in large pretrained language models such as BERT. While cross-lingual approaches are on the rise, most current natural language processing techniques are designed and applied to English, and less-resourced languages are lagging behind. In morphologically rich languages, information is conveyed through morphology, for example, through affixes modifying stems of words. The existing neural approaches do not explicitly use the information on word morphology. We analyse the effect of adding morphological features to LSTM and BERT models. As a testbed, we use three tasks available in many less-resourced languages: named entity recognition (NER), dependency parsing (DP) and comment filtering (CF). We construct baselines involving LSTM and BERT models, which we adjust by adding additional input in the form of part of speech (POS) tags and universal features. We compare the models across several languages from different language families. Our results suggest that adding morphological features has mixed effects depending on the quality of features and the task. The features improve the performance of LSTM-based models on the NER and DP tasks, while they do not benefit the performance on the CF task. For BERT-based models, the added morphological features only improve the performance on DP when they are of high quality (i.e., manually checked) while not showing any practical improvement when they are predicted. Even for high-quality features, the improvements are less pronounced in language-specific BERT variants compared to massively multilingual BERT models. As in NER and CF datasets manually checked features are not available, we only experiment with predicted features and find that they do not cause any practical improvement in performance.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Artificial Intelligence,Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics,Software
Reference96 articles.
1. On the Frailty of Universal POS Tags for Neural UD Parsers
2. Marton, Y. , Habash, N. and Rambow, O. (2010). Improving Arabic dependency parsing with lexical and inflectional morphological features. In Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 First Workshop on Statistical Parsing of Morphologically-Rich Languages, pp. 13–21.
3. Convolutional Neural Networks for Toxic Comment Classification
4. Nivre, J. (2003). An efficient algorithm for projective dependency parsing. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Parsing Technologies, pp. 149–160.
5. LIMIT-BERT : Linguistics Informed Multi-Task BERT
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献