Abstract
Scholars interested in international relations theory and history are indebted to
Mark Kramer for his splendid review of new historical evidence on the role of ideas
and power during the Cold War. I agree with Kramer that new evidence by itself
never settles learned debates such as the one he reviews. However, the sharper the
debate, the bigger the potential payoff from fresh evidence. Toward that end, I have
three comments.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献