Comparative studies on the effects of feeding different types of oils at two levels on the performance and carcass characteristics of growing pigs in the tropics

Author:

Babatunde G. M.,Fetuga B. L.,Oyenuga V. A.

Abstract

SUMMARYTwo feeding trials involving 105 pigs weighing approximately 14·5 kg were carried out to investigate the effects of palm oil, groundnut oil, locally produced lard, and beef tallow at 2·5% and 5% of the diet, on performance characteristics and carcass quality. The pigs were of the Yorkshire and Yorkshire × Landrace crosses, and of both sexes. The 23% protein basal diet had no oil added, and the other eight diets were made from the basal diet by the weight-for-weight substitution of the maize with the 2·5% or 5% levels of the four oil types. The results of the two trials were combined and considered as a 2 × 4 factorial experiment (2 levels and 4 types of oil) with the basal diet serving as the control. Only the pigs in the second trial were slaughtered and their carcasses graded at the average live weight of 57±1 kg. Correlation and regression analyses were made on some performance and carcass characteristics, on the average daily digestible energy intake. Results showed no significant treatment differences in the average daily gains, average daily feed intake, and average daily digestible energy intake, but there were highly significant treatment differences in feed consumed/kg of gain and average digestible energy (DE) consumed/kg of gain (P<0·01). None of the carcass quality parameters showed any significant treatment differences. Both the correlation and the regression coefficients for the average daily gain on DE intake were highly significant for all the oil types and levels, but the relationships were low and non-significant when the feed/gain ratio, average backfat thickness and the average percentage of lean cuts were regressed on the daily DE intake.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Animal Science and Zoology

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3