Author:
Eza-Nuñez P,Fariñas-Alvarez C,Fernandez N Perez
Abstract
AbstractObjectives:This study aimed to evaluate the results of the video head impulse test and of the caloric and rotatory chair tests in patients with dizziness. Agreement between test results was assessed and the best protocol for detecting peripheral vestibulopathy was identified.Methods:Participants comprised 116 patients, 75 with a peripheral vestibulopathy and 41 with non-peripheral vestibulopathy. The main outcome measures were classified as normal or abnormal according to our laboratory data.Results:Agreement between tests was low. Vestibulopathy testing that required all three results to be abnormal had a sensitivity of 0.547, a specificity of 0.878, and positive and negative predictive values of 0.891 and 0.514, respectively. Vestibulopathy testing that required just one result to be abnormal had a sensitivity of 0.933, a specificity of 0.292, and positive and negative predictive values of 0.701 and 0.705, respectively.Conclusion:In peripheral vestibulopathy, there was weak concordance in the assessment of horizontal semicircular canal function among the different tests. However, the video head impulse test had sufficient statistical power to be recommended as the first-line test.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Otorhinolaryngology,General Medicine
Reference23 articles.
1. Rotational Chair (ROTO) Instead of Electronystagmography (ENG) as the Primary Vestibular Test
2. Factor analysis and correlation between dizziness handicap inventory and dizziness characteristics and impact on quality of life scales;Perez;Acta Otolaryngol,2001
3. Laboratory testing of the vestibular system
4. Impulsive Testing of Semicircular-Canal Function Using Video-oculography
5. Side effects and patients expectations after vestibular tests [in French];Boleas-Aguirre;Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord),2009
Cited by
19 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献