Author:
Nash R,Randhawa N,Saeed S R
Abstract
AbstractBackground:Venous thromboembolism is uncommon in ENT practice. There are no specific venous thromboembolism prophylaxis guidelines for ENT surgery, despite the bleeding risks associated with ENT surgery and the low incidence of venous thromboembolism.Methods:An online poll of the ENT UK expert panel was conducted on the use of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis.Results:A total of 132 responses were received. Of the respondents, 84.5 per cent routinely assess all of their patients for venous thromboembolism risk. In addition, 75.4 per cent use local health trust guidelines, with the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence being the most common source of national guidelines. There was significant heterogeneity in the use of low molecular weight heparin. Only 53.7 per cent of respondents felt that the guidelines they currently used reflect their practice.Conclusion:There is significant heterogeneity in venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. There is therefore scope for revision of the ENT UK venous thromboembolism prophylaxis guidelines to reflect general ENT practice.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Otorhinolaryngology,General Medicine
Reference9 articles.
1. ENT UK, 2010. Guidelines on Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Prophylaxis. In: https://www.entuk.org/sites/default/files/files/prophylaxis_guideline_2010.pdf [3 February 2013]
2. Incidence of Venous Thromboembolism in Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery
3. Centre for Clinical Practice at NICE, 2010. Venous Thromboembolism: Reducing the Risk. In: http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CG92 [3 February 2013]
4. Deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in otolaryngologic patients
5. The Sunnybrook experience: review of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in otolaryngology;Lee;J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg,2008
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献