Author:
INCERA SARA,McLENNAN CONOR T.
Abstract
We used mouse tracking to compare the performance of bilinguals and monolinguals in a Stroop task. Participants were instructed to respond to the color of the words (e.g., blue in yellow font) by clicking on response options on the screen. We recorded participants’ movements of a computer mouse: when participants started moving (initiation times), and how fast they moved towards the correct response (x-coordinates over time). Interestingly, initiation times were longer for bilinguals than monolinguals. Nevertheless, when comparing mouse trajectories, bilinguals moved faster towards the correct response. Taken together, these results indicate that bilinguals behave qualitatively differently from monolinguals; bilinguals are “experts” at managing conflicting information. Experts across many different domains take longer to initiate a response, but then they outperform novices. These qualitative differences in performance could be at the root of apparently contradictory findings in the bilingual literature.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics,Education
Reference35 articles.
1. On the bilingual advantage in conflict processing: Now you see it, now you don’t
2. Incera S. (2014). The time course of a bilingual Stroop task. (Electronic Thesis). Retrieved from https://etd.ohiolink.edu/
3. MouseTracker: Software for studying real-time mental processing using a computer mouse-tracking method
4. Time course of inhibition in color-response and word-response versions of the Stroop task;Sugg;Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,1994
5. Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system
Cited by
43 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献