Abstract
Quantification of Paleozoic, Triassic, Jurassic, and Cretaceous ammonoid shell ornamentation shows that commonality and roughness of ornamentation increased throughout the geologic range of the ammonoids. The two major hypotheses concerning the function of ammonoid shell ornamentation are that 1) ornament served a protective (defensive) function against shell breakage by predators, and 2) it increased hydrodynamic efficiency of the shell during swimming. The heavily ribbed and spined ammonoid shells of the late Mesozoic have ornamentation too coarse to have served any hydrodynamic purpose. The increasing proportion of such shells during the Jurassic and Cretaceous may have been in response to increased numbers of late Mesozoic shell crushing predators and “better armed” ammonoid prey. This trend parallels adaptive trends of other invertebrate groups during the “Mesozoic marine revolution” as defined by Vermeij (1977).
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Paleontology,General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,Ecology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference14 articles.
1. Westermann G. 1971. Form, structure and function of shell and siphuncle in coiled Mesozoic ammonoids. Life Sciences Contributions, R. Ontario Mus., no. 78. 39 pp.
2. Teichert C. 1967. Major features of cephalopod evolution. pp. 162–201. In: Teichert C. and Yochelson E. , eds. Essays in Paleontology and Stratigraphy. Univ. Kansas Press, Spec. Publ. 2.
3. V.—Notes on Ammonites
4. Uber Frasspuren an Ammonitenschalen;Roll;Zbl. Miner. Geol. Palantol. Abt.,1935
Cited by
73 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献