The Importance of Addressing Multidrug Resistance and Not Assuming Single-Drug Resistance in Case-Control Studies

Author:

D'Agata Erika M. C.,Cataldo Maria Adriana,Cauda Roberto,Tacconelli Evelina

Abstract

Background.Case-control studies analyzing antibiotic exposure as a risk factor for antimicrobial resistance usually assume single-drug resistance in the bacteria under study, even though resistance to multiple antimicrobials may be present. Since antibiotic selection pressures differ depending on the susceptibility profile of the antimicrobial-resistant bacteria, an accurate assessment of whether exposure to an individual antimicrobial is a risk factor for the emergence of resistance should distinguish between single-drug–resistant and multidrug-resistant bacteria.Objective.To determine whether the exposures to individual antibiotics that were identified as independent risk factors in case-control studies differed depending on whether single-drug–resistant or multidrug-resistant bacteria were evaluated.Design.Two retrospective case-control studies were performed with data on patients harboringPseudomonas aeruginosastrains resistant only to ciprofloxacin (CRPA) and patients harboringP. aeruginosastrains resistant to ciprofloxacin and other antibiotics (multidrug-resistantP. aeruginosa[MDR-PA]). These 2 groups were compared with patients not harboringP. aeruginosa.Setting.Two tertiary care hospitals.Results.A total of 41 patients harboring CRPA and 151 patients harboring MDR-PA were identified and matched to 192 control subjects. By conditional logistic regression, independent risk factors associated with presence of CRPA were nonambulatory status (OR, 5.6 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.4-23];P= .02) and prior ciprofloxacin exposure (OR, 5.0 [95% CI, 1.2-21];P= .03). Independent risk factors for presence of MDR-PA were a Charlson score greater than 2 (OR, 3.3 [95% CI 1.8-6.0];P<.001) and exposure to quinolones (OR, 2.8 [95% CI, 1.2-5.0];P= .001), third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins (OR, 3.5 [95% CI, 1.7-7.1];P<.001), imipenem (OR, 3.8 [95% CI, 1.2-12.1];P= .02), and/or aminoglycosides (OR, 2.3 [95% CI, 1.04-5.1];P= .04).Conclusion.There were substantial differences in exposure to individual antimicrobials between patients harboring CRPA and patients harboring MDR-PA. Future case-control studies addressing risk factors for single-drug–resistant bacteria should consider the complete susceptibility profile of the bacteria under investigation.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Infectious Diseases,Microbiology (medical),Epidemiology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3