Abstract
AbstractIn this reply to Losch (2019), I show that, Losch's own judgement notwithstanding, his plea for a concept of (trans-)planetary sustainability does propose conceptual change. I further argue that he has not provided convincing reasons to think that the label ‘planetary’ is superior to ‘trans-planetary’. I summarize my concerns about the plea for introducing the notion of (trans-)planetary sustainability and a related ethics.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous),Space and Planetary Science,Physics and Astronomy (miscellaneous),Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference7 articles.
1. NASA (2014) Our Vision for Planetary Sustainability, http://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/planetary_sustainability_pbrochure.pdf, last accessed February 16, 2019.
2. Planetary Biology--Paleontological, Geological, and Molecular Histories of Life
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献