Abstract
At the end of the nineteenth century, the northern port of Liverpool had become the second largest in the United Kingdom. Fast transatlantic steamers to Boston and other American ports exploited this route, increasing the risk of maritime disease epidemics. The 1901–3 epidemic in Liverpool was the last serious smallpox outbreak in Liverpool and was probably seeded from these maritime contacts, which introduced a milder form of the disease that was more difficult to trace because of its long incubation period and occurrence of undiagnosed cases. The characteristics of these epidemics in Boston and Liverpool are described and compared with outbreaks in New York, Glasgow and London between 1900 and 1903. Public health control strategies, notably medical inspection, quarantine and vaccination, differed between the two countries and in both settings were inconsistently applied, often for commercial reasons or due to public unpopularity. As a result, smaller smallpox epidemics spread out from Liverpool until 1905. This paper analyses factors that contributed to this last serious epidemic using the historical epidemiological data available at that time. Though imperfect, these early public health strategies paved the way for better prevention of imported maritime diseases.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
History,Medicine (miscellaneous),General Nursing
Reference212 articles.
1. The Statistics of Anti-Typhoid Vaccine and Anti-Cholera Inoculations, and the Interpretation of Such Statistics in General;Greenwood;Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine (Section Epidemiology and Statistics Medicine),1915
2. Ibid., 128.
3. The politics of prevention: Anti-vaccinationism and public health in nineteenth-century England
4. ‘The Smallpox, Liverpool, no Fresh Cases, Infected Cattlemen Removed to Hospital’, The Liverpool Daily Post, 8 February (1902), 6.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献