Abstract
Models of industrialization and social change, whether Marxist or functionalist, have been derived largely from the historical experience of Western Europe and, especially, of Britain. Social theories came to be constructed upon a specific reading of a particular, and in some respects, unique, historical development. These theories or models, now deepseated in our historiographical consciousness, increasingly offer yardsticks against which industrial development elsewhere in the world is measured. On closer examination, universal postulates thus derived have appeared to generate a large number of special cases. Vast expanses of the globe are seemingly littered with cases of arrested development or examples of frustrated bourgeois revolutions.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,History,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference222 articles.
1. India and the British Empire, 1880–1935;Tomlinson;IESHR,1975
2. The Trading World of Asia and the English East India Company 1660–1760
3. Mughal State Finance and the Premodern World Economy
4. The Silver Currency Output of the Mughal Empire and Prices in India in Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries;Hasan;IESHR,1969
5. Perlin , ‘Proto-Industrialization’
Cited by
30 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献