Abstract
The extraterritorial application of competition law on the basis of the effects doctrine of jurisdiction has long been controversial. An analysis of the assumptions which underlie the discourse of jurisdictional assertion leads, however, to the conclusion that the effects doctrine is the only principle on which competition law jurisdiction can reasonably be based.Moreover, a form of qualified effects principle, founded upon the consent of the undertakings involved, would be supported by most, if not all, of the leading players in the competition law arena.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,Political Science and International Relations
Reference12 articles.
1. Panel Discussion on the Extraterritorial Application of US Antitrust Laws;Rahl;Antitrust LJ,1985
2. The Doctrine of Jurisdiction Revisited After Twenty Years;Mann;Receuil des Cours (Hague),1984
3. Extraterritorial Jurisdiction and the US Antitrust Laws;Jennings;BYIL,1957
4. Jurisdiction in International Law;Akehurst;B YIL,1973
5. Reasonable Extraterritoriality: Correcting the “Balance of Interests”
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献