Abstract
AbstractInternational legal scholarship to date has largely neglected the donor-driven dynamics of international criminal justice. This article advances what I term ‘donors’ justice’ as an analytic frame for interpreting the work of international criminal tribunals. Donors’ justice is defined as third-party financial support for tribunal activity. It imports market rationalities into the field of criminal accountability, which assume overlapping discursive, political, and economic forms. The Special Court for Sierra Leone provides a case study of the implications of donor-driven logics for international criminal justice, particularly the material problems of insecure funding and the ethical problems of limited personal jurisdiction.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,Political Science and International Relations
Reference33 articles.
1. Dynamic Equilibrium: The Evolution of US Attitudes toward International Criminal Courts and Tribunals
2. Dancing with the Devil: Prosecuting West Africa's Warlords: Building Initial Prosecutorial Strategy for an International Tribunal after Third World Armed Conflicts;Crane;CWRJIL,2005
3. International Criminal Courts: Some Kudos and Concerns;Wald;Proceedings of the American Philosophical Association,2006
4. Hybridgerichte – eine neue Generation internationaler Strafgerichte (I)
5. TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE IN TRANSIT: WHY TRANSFERRING A SPECIAL COURT FOR SIERRA LEONE TRIAL TO THE HAGUE DEFEATS THE PURPOSES OF HYBRID TRIBUNALS
Cited by
30 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献