Author:
Freedman Rosa,Lemay-Hébert Nicolas
Abstract
AbstractWhile the cholera outbreak in Haiti still claims victims every month, it is also the backdrop of one of the biggest legal battles the UN has been engaged in – one for the recognition of harm caused and for reparations for victims of cholera. Having used its immunity to disengage from the issue, the UN finally changed its stance in December 2016 and apologized for the organization’s role in the cholera outbreak. This article analyses the role of the elected members of the Security Council – alongside other key stakeholders – in contributing to the UN’s change of policy. Based on privileged access to a number of actors in this politico-legal fight, this article argues that elected members of the Security Council have played a crucial role in pushing the UN to ‘do the right thing’. This article, along with other contributions to this special issue, sheds a different light on the practices inside the Security Council, demonstrating that elected members are far from being powerless, as most of the literature on the subject tends to assume. They can successfully play a significant role inside the organization when the right conditions permit them to play this role.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,Political Science and International Relations
Reference34 articles.
1. Leveraging diplomatic power and influence on the UN Security Council: the case of Australia;Farrall;Australian Journal of International Relations,2016
2. Haiti and the international community: A case study
3. Understanding the Cholera Epidemic, Haiti
4. The United Nations as good Samaritan: immunity and responsibility;Boon;Chinese Journal of International Law Int’l,2015
5. International Organisations and Immunity from Jurisdiction: to Restrict or to Bypass
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献