Abstract
AbstractWithin international institutions such as the International Criminal Court (ICC), lawyers increasingly encounter managerial practices which are designed to improve organizational efficiency and cost-effectiveness. Charting this trend, scholars have analyzed these practices with a view to make them more legitimate. However, this scholarly focus overlooks the role of managerial practices in legitimizing and thus sustaining the institutions in which they are embedded. In this article, I ask how managerial practices operate to boost the ICC’s reputation among its global audience. I find the answer in the Court’s use of the juxtaposed images of bureaucracy and management, with all their negative and positive associations. The Court uses these images to narrate a story of its own internal evolution from inefficient bureaucracy to efficient and well-managed organization. This hidden narrative of institutional progress functions rhetorically to frame, focus and distract the attention of the Court’s global constituencies.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,Political Science and International Relations
Cited by
35 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Conclusion;Victims and the Labour of Justice at the International Criminal Court;2024-05-30
2. Money and Land: Resistance in Times of Capitalist Complementarity;Victims and the Labour of Justice at the International Criminal Court;2024-05-30
3. Reparations, Abolitionist Imaginaries, and Self-transforming Victims: Transformative Justice at the ICC;Victims and the Labour of Justice at the International Criminal Court;2024-05-30
4. Translators, Compradors, or Ideological Labourers? The Role of the ICC’s Intermediaries;Victims and the Labour of Justice at the International Criminal Court;2024-05-30
5. Creating the Victim: From Innocent Victims to Indebted Subjects;Victims and the Labour of Justice at the International Criminal Court;2024-05-30