Abstract
AbstractWith the rise of a new generation of investment policies, upgrading existing bilateral investment treaties (BITs) is of significant interest to states. China has upgraded 28 per cent of its investment treaties in various ways. Two investment arbitration tribunals and one highest court at the seat of arbitration have recently rendered decisions favouring the application of old Chinese BITs over the upgraded ones. China's experience with upgrading BITs may provide general policy discourse and direction for other countries planning to upgrade their BITs. Using China's experience, this article categorizes different methods of upgrading BITs into the Coexistence Model (parties to an old BIT join existing or new free trade agreements or a regional investment agreement), the Replacement Model (replace an old BIT with a new one), the Amendment Model (amend an old BIT by a protocol) and the Joint Interpretation Model (make a diplomatic announcement to interpret a BIT). This article also discusses the benefits and challenges of each model and concludes with directions for future BIT upgrading.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,Political Science and International Relations
Reference26 articles.
1. Trade, Investment and Dispute Settlement: China's Practice in International Investment Law: From Participation to Leadership in the World Economy;Wang;Yale J. Int'l L,2009
2. One Country, Two Systems: Theory into Practice;Wang;Pacific Rim Law and Policy Journal,1998
3. Treaty Interpretation and the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: 30 Years on
4. Queries to the Recent ICSID Decision on Jurisdiction upon the Case of Tza Yap Shum v. Republic of Peru: Should China-Peru BIT 1994 Be Applied to Hong Kong SAR under the One Country Two Systems Policy;Chen;Journal of World Investment and Trade,2009
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献