Abstract
AbstractThis article highlights the challenges to the operation of domestic courts as agents of development of the laws of armed conflict and particularly of the law on the conduct of hostilities. The first part of the article concerns the spillover from various branches of the laws of armed conflict to the law regarding the conduct of hostilities. The second part of the article addresses the structural constraints on domestic courts in deciding issues relating to the laws of armed conflict, focusing on the conflict between their role as guardians of national interests and their judicial commitment to protecting the individual. The cumulative effect of these characteristics of domestic litigation suggests that the laws of armed conflict, and particularly the law on the conduct of hostilities, are not necessarily well served by development through domestic jurisprudence.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,Political Science and International Relations
Reference20 articles.
1. Occupational Hazards: Labor Rights in the Occupied Territories;Paz-fuchs;Berkeley Journal of International Law,2012
2. Reclaiming Democracy: The Strategic Uses of Foreign and International Law by National Courts
3. The Dark Sides of Convergence: A Pro-Civilian Critique of the Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Law in Armed Conflict;Modirzadeh;US Naval War College International Law Studies (Blue Book) Series,2010
4. When Do Treaties Create Individually Enforceable Rights? The Supreme Court Ducks the Issue in Hamdan and Sanchez-Llamas;Sloss;Columbia Journal of Transnational Law,2006
5. COMPARATIVE INTERNATIONAL LAW? THE ROLE OF NATIONAL COURTS IN CREATING AND ENFORCING INTERNATIONAL LAW
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献