Abstract
AbstractThe equal application of international humanitarian law (jus in bello) to all parties to an international armed conflict is a cornerstone principle of jus in bello. In his article, Professor Mandel casts doubt on the legal basis of this principle. Reacting to this claim, this contribution demonstrates that the ‘equality of belligerents’ is a principle firmly grounded in both conventional and customary international law. Moreover, its legal force withstands the test of international jurisprudence, including the International Court of Justice's controversial Nuclear Weapons advisory opinion.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,Political Science and International Relations
Reference38 articles.
1. The Limits of the Operation of the Law of War;Lauterpacht;BYIL,1953
2. Validity of the Acts of the Belligerent Occupant;Morgenstern;BYIL,1951
3. Captured Enemy Property: Booty of War and Seized Enemy Property
4. Military Necessity and Humanity in International Humanitarian Law: Preserving the Delicate Balance;Schmitt;Virginia Journal of International Law,2010
Cited by
37 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献