Abstract
AbstractThis article provides a brief overview of legal realism and sketches out its implications for international law, using international environmental law as an example. Although the ‘new’ legal realism is not especially new, its anti-formalist, pragmatic perspective still offers important insights about the international legal process, and serves as a useful counterpoint to a new variety of formalism, which continues to resist the social scientific study of international law. Among its distinctive elements, legal realism views international law instrumentally, is empirical in orientation, and focuses on the processes by which international law is developed, implemented, and enforced, rather than limiting itself to international law doctrine. The fear of critics is that, by de-emphasizing the internal point of view and the concept of legal validity, legal realism deprives international law of the very features that make it a distinctive enterprise.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,Political Science and International Relations
Reference23 articles.
1. The Relative Autonomy of International Law or the Forgotten Politics of Interdisciplinarity;Klabbers;Journal of International Law and International Relations,2004/2005
2. Transcendental Nonsense and the Functional Approach
3. Remarks;Chayes;Proceedings of the American Society of International Law,1963
4. What I Ate for Breakfast and Other Mysteries of Judicial Decision Making;Kozinski;Loyola Los Angeles Law Review,1992–1993
5. Effect of feeling good on helping: Cookies and kindness.
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献