Do African Systems of Land Tenure Require A Special Terminology?

Abstract

Expressions Indicating varying degrees of dissatisfaction with systems of land tenure prevailing in sub-Saharan Africa are very common, and the view is widely held that the traditional institutions which govern land rights operate in a manner obstructive to agricultural development. “If enterprise is to be given an opportunity to express itself”, writes Dr. Yudelman in a recent book, “there must be a break with traditional institutions which govern land”.Views of this kind call for decisions regarding the substitution of one system of law for another, or for various kinds of radical reform including the engrafting onto the traditional system of legal expedients and devices proved useful in other systems of law. Such decisions, however, patently require much more than a mere nodding acquaintance with the existing local law, the changes sought to be introduced therein, and their functioning in the systems of law from which they are to be borrowed. Accordingly a need exists for a kind of comparative legal analysis of existing systems of landholding which can throw into relief the real points of weakness that need to be remedied or pruned away, while also indicating the elements that are worthy to be retained, if even only as the stock upon which novel arrangements may be engrafted.