Author:
Subai Pereowei,Caliskan Samet
Abstract
AbstractThis article argues that Nigeria should introduce a competition disqualification regime for company directors as a deliberate strategy to foster corporate compliance with the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Act 2018. It contends that the custodial and financial sanctions provided for under the act may not sufficiently deter directors from engaging in anti-competitive behaviour. It seeks to demonstrate that the “threat” of incarceration, which would ordinarily have a strong deterrent effect, is rarely imposed, as courts tend to prefer imposing fines on directors and individuals who breach competition law. For that reason, the article proposes that Nigeria should adopt a strategy of disqualifying directors who oversee companies that breach competition law, or who are complicit in that regard, as a means of complementing existing sanctions. In order to achieve its objective, the article examines the competition disqualification regime in the UK in order to extract valuable lessons that Nigeria can emulate.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference16 articles.
1. The Nigerian telecommunication industry: Analysis of the first fifteen years of the growths and challenges in the GSM market (2001–2016);Nkordeh;Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science,2017
2. Why is the United States so different from the rest of the world in imposing serious criminal sanctions on individual cartel participants?;Baker;Sedona Conference Journal,2013
3. Competition law and policy in developing countries: A critical assessment of the challenges to establishing an effective competition law regime;Dabbah;World Competition,2010
4. Individual Sanctions of Competition Law: A Comparison between the UK and Turkey