Author:
Chen L.,Herreman W.,Jackson A.
Abstract
Many flows of electrically conducting fluids can spontaneously generate magnetic fields through the process of dynamo action, but when does a flow produce a better dynamo than another one or when is it simply the most efficient dynamo? Using a variational approach close to that of Willis (Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 109, 2012, 251101), we find optimal kinematic dynamos within a huge class of stationary and incompressible flows that are confined in a cube. We demand that the magnetic field satisfies either superconducting (T) or pseudovacuum (N) boundary conditions on opposite pairs of walls of the cube, which results in four different combinations. For each of these set-ups, we find the optimal flow and its corresponding magnetic eigenmodes. Numerically, it is observed that swapping the magnetic boundary from T to N leaves the magnetic energy growth nearly unchanged, and both $+\boldsymbol{U}$ and $-\boldsymbol{U}$ are optimal flows for these different but complementary set-ups. This can be related to work by Favier & Proctor (Phys. Rev. E, vol. 88, 2013, 031001). We provide minimal lower bounds for dynamo action and find that no dynamo is possible below an enstrophy (or shear) based magnetic Reynolds number $Rm_{c,min}=7.52{\rm\pi}^{2}$, which is a factor of $16$ above the Proctor/Backus bound.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Mechanical Engineering,Mechanics of Materials,Condensed Matter Physics
Reference25 articles.
1. Spectral-element and adjoint methods in seismology;Tromp;Commun. Comput. Phys.,2008
2. Optimized kinematic dynamos
3. Velocity Profile Optimization for the Riga Dynamo Experiment
4. Dynamo action of fluid motions with two-dimensional periodicity
5. The growth of a magnetic field in a three dimensional steady incompressible flow;Arnold;Vestnik Moskov. Univ. Ser. I Mat. Mekh.,1983
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献