Abstract
To explain the strong finding that democracies rarely fight other democracies, analysts typically focus on some attribute of regime type. This linkage may be spurious, at least in part. The emergence and persistence of the first wave of liberal republics and democracies were greatly facilitated by the prior resolution of regional primacy questions. Because early democracies did not engage fully in competitions for regional primacy and territorial expansion, they were less likely to attack other states, democracies or otherwise, in their home regions. Nonexpansionist foreign policies also discouraged the domestic concentration of economic and political power, which in turn facilitated democratization processes. Four historical cases illustrate how regional primacy issues preceded the development of democracy and either undermined or facilitated democratization processes in major powers that have been especially important to the annals of war participation. Further research on whether peace antecedes democracy or the other way around appears warranted.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Cited by
217 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Co-Evolution and Spatial Diffusion;Piecing Together the Peaces;2024-10-02
2. More Measurement Issues for Diffusion, Zones of Peace, and Network Effects;Piecing Together the Peaces;2024-10-02
3. Zones of Peace and Neighborhood Diffusion;Piecing Together the Peaces;2024-10-02
4. A Dyadic Perspective;Piecing Together the Peaces;2024-10-02
5. Measurement Issues;Piecing Together the Peaces;2024-10-02