Abstract
The decade since the formation of the European Economic Community (EEC) in 1957 has been marked by an impressive growth of theorizing about the causes of international regional integration in Europe and in other parts of the world. However, differences in approach to conceptualization and measurement of the dependent variable—integration—have led to two kinds of problems. First, it is difficult to relate the concepts of different authors to each other, and to a certain extent integration theorists have “talked past each other”. In other instances where theorists have indeed confronted each other, such as in the controversy over the current condition of the EEC (described below), differences in conceptualization have made the dispute unnecessarily difficult to resolve.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Reference44 articles.
1. Nordic Integration
2. Mitrany David , “The Prospect of Integration: Federal or Functional?” in Nye (ed.), International Regionalism, pp. 68–69
3. THE STUDY OF EUROPEAN INSTITUTIONS: SOME PROBLEMS OF ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL ORGANIZATION
4. Haas , The Uniting of Europe, p. 7
Cited by
126 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Comparing Regional Law;The Cambridge Handbook of Comparative Law;2024-02-01
2. Comparative Law beyond the State;The Cambridge Handbook of Comparative Law;2024-02-01
3. Pan-Africanism and Regional Integration;IGAD and Multilateral Security in the Horn of Africa;2024
4. Pathways of Crisis Outcomes;Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics;2024
5. La seguridad alimentaria en el Salvador bajo la perspectiva del regionalismo abierto: el Tratado de Libre Comercio (Cafta);Revista Diecisiete: Investigación Interdisciplinar para los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible.;2023-10-03