Abstract
AbstractAid donors pursue a strategy of targeted development with regard to recipient states. The determinants of aid allocation have shifted significantly. Industrialized states are increasingly unable to insulate themselves from spillovers caused by underdevelopment abroad. Donors attempt to use aid to decrease these spillovers, targeting developing countries where the effects on the donor are anticipated to be large. Once a recipient is chosen, concern for recipient government capacity guides the composition of aid. Empirical analysis of aid allocation from 1973 to 2012 demonstrates that, while explanations based on security and economic ties to the donor explain allocation well in the Cold War, the post-2001 period is best understood by incorporating a role for targeted development. This framework helps synthesize various findings in the aid allocation literature and has important implications for studying aid effectiveness.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Reference64 articles.
1. Will the ‘global war on terrorism’ be the new Cold War?
2. Marshall Monty G. , and Keith Jaggers . 2013. Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2013. Dataset Users’ Manual. Center for Systemic Peace. College Park: University of Maryland. Available at .
3. Aid and Governance: Negative Returns?
4. Globalization: What's New? What's Not? (And So What?)
5. Evidence on Changes in Aid Allocation Criteria
Cited by
106 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献