Author:
Keohane Robert O.,Macedo Stephen,Moravcsik Andrew
Abstract
AbstractInternational organizations are widely believed to undermine domestic democracy. Our analysis challenges this conventional wisdom, arguing that multilateral institutions can enhance the quality of national democratic processes, even in well-functioning democracies, in a number of important ways: by restricting the power of special interest factions, protecting individual rights, and improving the quality of democratic deliberation, while also increasing capacities to achieve important public purposes. The article discusses conflicts and complementarities between multilateralism and democracy, outlines a working conception of constitutional democracy, elaborates theoretically the ways in which multilateral institutions can enhance constitutional democracy, and discusses the empirical conditions under which multilateralism is most likely to have net democratic benefits, using contemporary examples to illustrate the analysis. The overall aim is to articulate a set of critical democratic standards appropriate for evaluating and helping to guide the reform of international institutions.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Reference91 articles.
1. Has Globalization Gone Too Far?
2. The Supreme Court and Foreign Sources of Law: Two Hundred Years of Practice and the Juvenile Death Penalty Decision;Calabresi;William and Mary Law Review,2005
3. Hafner-Burton Emilie , Mansfield Edward D. , and Pevehouse Jon C. . 2008. Democratization and Human Rights Regimes. Available at Social Science Research Network: ⟨http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1123771⟩. Accessed 14 October 2008.
Cited by
322 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献