Author:
Abbate Angela,Eickmeier Sandra,Prieto Esteban
Abstract
Abstract
We assess the effects of financial shocks on inflation, and to what extent financial shocks can account for the “missing disinflation” during the Great Recession. We apply a Bayesian vector autoregressive model to US data and identify financial shocks through a combination of narrative and short-run sign restrictions. Our main finding is that contractionary financial shocks temporarily increase inflation. This result withstands a large battery of robustness checks. Negative financial shocks help therefore to explain why inflation did not drop more sharply in the aftermath of the financial crisis. Our analysis suggests that higher borrowing costs after negative financial shocks can account for the modest decrease in inflation after the financial crisis. A policy implication is that financial shocks act as supply-type shocks, moving output and inflation in opposite directions, thereby worsening the trade-off for a central bank with a dual mandate.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics
Reference91 articles.
1. The unreliability of credit-to-GDP ratio gaps in real time: Implications for countercyclical capital buffers;Edge;International Journal of Central Banking,2011
2. Balleer, A. , Hristov, N. and Menno, D. (2015) Financial market imperfections and the pricing decision of firms: Theory and evidence. No 1173, 2015 Meeting Papers from Society for Economic Dynamics.
3. Monetary policy, inflation expectations and the price puzzle;Castelnuovo;Economic Journal,2010
4. Effects of the US monetary policy shocks during financial crises – a threshold vector autoregression approach
5. Uncertainty shocks are aggregate demand shocks
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献