Why Do Firms Disagree with Short Sellers? Managerial Myopia versus Private Information

Author:

Bargeron Leonce,Bonaime AliceORCID

Abstract

Though short sellers on average succeed at identifying overvalued equity, firms often signal disagreement with short sellers by repurchasing stock when short interest increases. We investigate whether this disagreement reflects a myopic defense of inflated prices, or positive private information. These repurchases appear motivated by managers’ private information, not agency issues, even when managerial benefits to short-termism are enhanced or monitoring is weaker. Managers’ informational advantage relates to subsequent news, earnings, and risk, but is attenuated if activists target management or insiders sell. A trading strategy based on our findings earns 7.5% annually.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Accounting

Reference65 articles.

1. Short-Sale Restrictions and Market Reaction to Short-Interest Announcements

2. Stock repurchases as an earnings management device

3. Common stock repurchases and market signalling

4. Asquith, P. , and Meulbroek, L. . “An Empirical Investigation of Short Interest.” Working Paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Claremont McKenna College (1995).

5. Short Selling and the Price Discovery Process

Cited by 11 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Individual investors’ dividend taxes and managerial myopia;Finance Research Letters;2024-04

2. Minimum wage effects on firms’ R&D investment: Evidence from China;International Review of Economics & Finance;2023-09

3. Whose opinion matters when insiders disagree with short sellers?;Journal of Business Finance & Accounting;2022-12-02

4. Deregulating Innovation Capital: The Effects of the JOBS Act on Biotech Startups;The Review of Corporate Finance Studies;2022-12-01

5. Flexibility in share repurchases: Evidence from UK;European Financial Management;2022-04-02

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3