Abstract
There are a multitude of explanations for the depth and length of the Great Depression, of which uncertainty has been proposed as one possible explanation (Romer 1990). The 1930s not only saw extreme declines in output and prices, but stock volatility was also at record highs (Schwert 1989). This high stock volatility was generated by a series of discontinuous jumps as news about uncertainty arrived regularly during the 1930s, as shown by applying the Barndorff-Nielsen and Shephard (2006) test for jumps in a time-series. To provide a more historical narrative for these jumps, I outline some key events during the Great Depression that generated a sense of uncertainty for businesses and households which occurred contemporaneously to these extreme jumps. While much of the literature has placed Roosevelt's New Deal as a primary source of uncertainty, I do not find much evidence for this hypothesis, and instead find that banking crises, the breakdown of the gold standard, popular unrest and uncertainty related to the brewing war in Europe were primarily responsible for both jumps in returns and the uncertainty of the 1930s.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Has the heterogeneity of culture, investor sentiment and uncertainty altered bank stock returns in the MENA region?;Journal of Economic Studies;2023-08-08
2. Banks’ return reaction to freedom, sentiment, and uncertainty;Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity;2023-03
3. Stock Market Prediction During COVID-19 Pandemic: A Time-Series Big Data Analysis Method;Big Data Analytics for Smart Urban Systems;2023
4. Bank return heterogeneity, do governance, sentiment, and uncertainty matter?;Cogent Economics & Finance;2022-11-29
5. The role of trust, investor sentiment, and uncertainty on bank stock return performance: Evidence from the MENA region;The Journal of Economic Asymmetries;2022-11