The dynamics of the host-parasite relationship

Abstract

The studies presented in this paper describe the effects of control exerted by the immunological response of the host (sheep) on the developmental stages and fecundity of the parasite Nematodirus spathiger. Thirty Merino lambs, maintained worm-free, were randomly divided among three treatment groups each containing ten animals. The group 1 lambs were each given a single dose of 50,000 infective larvae, the group 2 animals were given a single dose of 130,000 infective larvae, and the group 3 animals were given twenty-five consecutive daily doses of 2000 infective larvae. Group fecundity was estimated by performing worm egg counts on daily faecal samples and development of the parasite burden was followed by carrying out differential worm counts on animals slaughtered at crucial stages during the infections. Total fecundity was greatest in group 1 and least in group 3 with group 2 intermediate. An inverse relationship between total fecundity and percentage retardation of development (percentage of 4th-stage larvae in the total worm burden) was demonstrated between the three treatment groups.The results of the studies also show that control of the parasitic infection is mediated about threshold levels of immunological responsiveness and is expressed by (1) elimination at the infective (L3) stage, (2) retardation of development at the L4 stage, (3) reduction in egg production of the adult female, (4) elimination of adult worms, and (5) discrimination against the female in both the degree of retardation in the L4 stage and the extent of elimination in the adult stage.Great variation in response was observed between individuals within treatment groups. The source of variation is attributed to differences in degree of antigenic disparity of the parasite with individual members of the heterozygous host population in which antigenic characters are not uniformly segregated.The concept of ‘fitness’ of the parasitic species was introduced into the discussion to provide a rational interpretation of the results.We are indebted to Dr S. S. Y. Young, Division of Animal Genetics, C.S.I.R.O., for advice and assistance with the statistical analyses, which were performed by Mrs M. Tonkin, and to Dr D. F. Stewart for his constructive criticism of the manuscript. Careful technical assistance was given by Mr E. Teleki and Misses Helen Giller and Berenice Merchant.