Non-random patterns of host use by the different parasite species exploiting a cockle population

Abstract

Different parasite species sharing the same intermediate host species may have similar or conflicting interests, depending on whether they are at the same stage in their life-cycle or whether they share the same definitive host. In the New Zealand cockle, Austrovenus stutchburyi, metacercariae of the digenean Meiogymnophallus sp. are positively associated with metacercariae of Curtuteria australis. This relationship is found in different cockle samples, and is independent of cockle shell size, which suggests that it is not merely the product of metacercariae accumulation over time. Both digenean species have the same definitive host, oystercatchers. Metacercariae of C. australis manipulate the phenotype of cockles, impairing the cockle's ability to burrow in the sediments. This makes the host more susceptible to oystercatcher predation. Thus Meiogymnophallus sp. can benefit by associating with C. australis and may hitch a ride with the manipulator parasite. This is supported by the finding that cockles impaired by C. australis and lying at the sediment surface harbour greater numbers of Meiogymnophallus than buried cockles. A third digenean species, whose sporocysts are found in cockles and which is not transmitted by predation, occurred only in surface cockles. Finally, a parasitic copepod with a direct life-cycle was found evenly distributed among buried and surface cockles, independently of their metacercarial loads. These results show that different parasite species do not use cockles in a random fashion, and that not all patterns of host use are consistent with shared or conflicting interests among parasites.