Abstract
AbstractIt has been more than a decade since China began her experiment of “One Country, Two Systems” in Hong Kong (HK). It is now generally assumed that the relationship between the legal systems of these two jurisdictions is monistic. Analysing post-Handover constitutional case law in HK, including a recent landmark decision on sovereign immunity, FG Hemisphere Associates LLC v. Democratic Republic of Congo, this article challenges this assumption and argues that the relationship between the two legal systems is best conceptualized as a form of legal pluralism found in the European Union.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Index;Hybrid Constitutionalism;2019-04-30
2. References;Hybrid Constitutionalism;2019-04-30
3. Epilogue;Hybrid Constitutionalism;2019-04-30
4. Transaction Cost Politics in Hong Kong and Macau;Hybrid Constitutionalism;2019-04-30
5. Comparative Constitutional Review in the Chinese Special Administrative Regions;Hybrid Constitutionalism;2019-04-30