Abstract
AbstractDuring the global commodities boom Indonesia, like many resource-rich countries, introduced an increasing number of nationalist policy interventions. However, the state has intervened assertively in some sectors and only passively in others. In Indonesia's mining sector, interventions that compel foreign divestment received widespread support from politicians and domestic industry; yet similar proposals to limit foreign investment in the strategic agribusiness sector have largely failed. This article brings the literature on resource nationalism into conversation with studies of business–state relations, in order to understand why nationalist mobilization met with more success in Indonesia's mining sector than in agribusiness. It argues that ownership structures constitute the source of this variation. Uniquely integrated patterns of domestic and foreign ownership in the strategic palm oil sub-sector constrained lawmakers’ nationalist agenda. Such constraints were less formidable in Indonesia's mining sector, where foreign capital is more easily differentiated, and concentrated in a sub-sector that contributes less overall to the Indonesian economy.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Economics and Econometrics,Sociology and Political Science,Development
Reference116 articles.
1. Processes of inclusion and adverse incorporation: oil palm and agrarian change in Sumatra, Indonesia
2. Mining Regime in Indonesia Rejuvenated;Budiman;Universitas Pelita Harapan Law Review,2011
3. Managing Indonesia
4. Stainslaw Joseph A. 2010. “Power Play: Resource Nationalism, the Global Scramble for Energy and the Need for Mutual Interdependence.” Deloitte Center for Energy Solutions.
5. World Bank. 2015. “High Expectations.” Indonesia Economic Quarterly Update. www.worldbank.org/content/dam/Worldbank/document/EAP/Indonesia/IEQ-MAR-2015-EN.pdf.
Cited by
29 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献