Abstract
AbstractIn January 2017, a business jet flew in Norway on a short repositioning flight with two pilots onboard, no passengers or cargo. Initially, the take-off proceeded as normal but as the landing gear was retracted both pilots observed that the airspeed was rapidly approaching the flap limiting speed of 200kts. When the flaps were fully retracted at a height of approximately 2,100ft above ground level, the crew experienced a violent nose-down pitch motion. Control was regained at a height of approximately 170ft above ground level and, following the accident, data from the flight data recorder showed that the aircraft experienced –2.62G during the pitch upset. A tailplane stall due to icing was suspected; however, the flight data recorder, being limited to 36 parameters, was not able to confirm this. For expediency during the accident investigation process, a simplified, linear flight dynamics model was developed using Matlab/Simulink to assess static and dynamic stability for a range of tailplane efficiency factors to simulate the effects of tailplane icing.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference28 articles.
1. [3] EASA, Regulation (EU) No. 996/2010 of The European Parliament and of the Council, 20 October 2010. https://www.easa.europa.eu/document-library/regulations/regulation-eu-no-9962010
2. General Aviation Loss of Control in Flight Accidents: Causal and Contributory Factors
3. [13] NASA, Small Airframe Manufacturer’s Icing Perspective, NASA/CP-2009-215797, Airframe Icing Workshop, NASA Glenn Research Center, June 9th, 2009. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20090030602/downloads/20090030602.pdf [retrieved 12 July 2022]
4. [6] SKYBRARY, General Aviation - Definition & Description, https://skybrary.aero/articles/general-aviation-ga [retrieved 12 July 2022]
5. NASA/FAA Tailplane Icing Program overview
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献